|
|
|
SpamPal Testimonials
Not sure whether SpamPal is for you? Maybe some glowing words of
praise from complete strangers will change your mind!
|
"Until now SpamPal catches 100% of spam and 0 % non-spam.
I'm very happy with the program, it saves me a lot of work.
Keep up the good work and thanks a lot !"
| |
|
Gerrit, The Netherlands
|
|
"Just to say thanks for developing SpamPal. I've tried all sorts of
other programs / filters, and none of them came close to SpamPal. I
get much more junk mail than real mail - SpamPal has allowed me to
retake control of my inbox!"
| |
|
Adam
|
|
"I have just downloaded this, and set it up for my home network. I am
*very* impressed!
Congratulations; thanks for giving it away; feel free to use this
endorsement in any way you see fit. I'm looking forward to the NT
Service version."
| |
|
Jack
|
|
Your program is without a doubt the finest anti spam program
available. I have highly recommended this program to many of my
friends and in addition my wife can not believe how spam free her
Email is.
| |
|
Logan
|
|
"My stubborn ISP now uses "DNS blacklists" to discard incoming email
based on domains that are even *suspected* by volunteer vigilantes of
harboring spammers. Vigilantes often mistakenly blacklisted Topica so
I couldn't receive any email from Topica domains. ... I've requested
that [my ISP] "whitelist" Topica and the NYTimes. ISP wouldn't; but
recently confessed they could remove *all* anti-spam filtering from my
account. I leaped at that option, and at leisure adopted SpamPal to
manage [my] received spam -- now UNDER MY CONTROL. ...
You may *want* your ISP to filter spam. But if you do, your ISP will
throw out false-positives [non-spam mistaken for spam] and you'll never
even see them.
"Here's that kind of danger: A year or so ago Julian sent me a personal
email that got him an error message and I never saw his email. A DNS
blacklist used by my ISP added insult to injury by calling Julian a dork.
J. blamed *me* for my stupid ISP. I blamed *him* because his ISP in UK
was slow to get un-blacklisted after one of its dial-in subscribers was
detected with (techie talk) an open relay. J. and I survived as friends
and I learned about the many blacklists and their vigilante
administrators.
"SpamPal lets me manage my own spam criteria. And doesn't
reject false-positives -- so it doesn't have me calling Julian a dork
thru my surrogate policeman ISP."
| |
|
Bill, near Seattle USA
|
|
"I have been using SpamPal for several months now. It is the perfect solution
for me. I conduct business via my email... it is absolutely essential that I
get certain emails. A spam program which deletes suspect email from the
server would cause me many problems. SpamPal's method of putting
suspect email into a separate folder is a perfect solution. I check that
folder once a day and retrieve any legitimate emails from it. Initially I
would estimate that SpamPal was about 85% to 90% accurate. A rare Spam
email gets through to my regular in-box, but most of the failures
were legitimate emails being tagged as Spam. But the SpamPal whitelist
means one can tweak the system and increase SpamPal's efficiency very
quickly. I would estimate now that it is sifting out spam at about
96% to 98% efficiency. Thanks for a great program.
| |
|
J.Williams, Southern Christian University, USA.
|
|
"I can't believe this exists. For the amount of setup,
maintenance, and technical skill required to make this work is
rediculous. It'll cost you time & money."
| |
|
Hendersii IV, review at Cnet.com.
|
Okay, maybe that last one isn't quite glowing, but I thought I'd
stick a negative opinion in here just for the hell of it.
|
|
|